Review an MCP server for common security gaps: LLM-facing surfaces as injection vector (tools, resources, prompts, descriptions), scope blast radius, destructive ops without consent, upstream auth shape, input sinks (URL / path / roots / shell / schema strictness / ReDoS), tenant isolation, leakage through errors and telemetry, unbounded resources, and HTTP-mode deployment surface. Use before a release, after a batch of handler changes, or when the user asks for a security review, audit, or hardening pass. Produces grouped findings and a numbered options list.
cp -r cryptoskill/skills/mcp-servers/cyanheads-security-pass .claude/skills/clawhub install cyanheads-security-passCapabilities below are detected automatically by an open-source scanner that reads the skill's text and scripts (see how this is computed). Not measured means the scanner couldn't make a confident call — it is NOT a green check, and you should treat it as a possible red flag until a human or a stronger scanner has measured it.
read_only Phase 1 single-mode classification — multi-mode breakdown deferred to Phase 2.
We did not find any well-known hosted services in this skill's text or scripts. This does NOT mean the skill is local-only — it might use services we don't yet recognize, or talk to them through code paths our scanner can't reach. A complete dependency list (every package, library, and binary, with integrity hashes) is on the roadmap; today we only show recognized hosts.
No one has audited this skill yet. That is different from “audited and clean” — it just means no professional reviewer (a security firm, the CryptoSkill team, or a verified independent researcher) has signed off on it. There are no audit reports to read. How reviewer levels work →
SKILL.md → SOURCE.md → TRUST.auto.yaml → Browse directory →
Auto-generated by cryptoskill/extract-capabilities/0.3.1 · hosted-service list version 2026-09-06 · how this is computed