Red-team protocol for trying to refute a research claim (theorem, speed-up, security level, novelty) before anyone else does. Use at the P6 falsification gate, before any number or theorem goes into the paper, and whenever a sub-agent reports a surprisingly good result. Produces a verdict of survived, weakened or refuted, with evidence, in CLAIMS.md.
cp -r cryptoskill/skills/dev-tools/acprk-falsify .claude/skills/clawhub install acprk-falsifyCapabilities below are detected automatically by an open-source scanner that reads the skill's text and scripts (see how this is computed). Not measured means the scanner couldn't make a confident call — it is NOT a green check, and you should treat it as a possible red flag until a human or a stronger scanner has measured it.
read_only Phase 1 single-mode classification — multi-mode breakdown deferred to Phase 2.
We did not find any well-known hosted services in this skill's text or scripts. This does NOT mean the skill is local-only — it might use services we don't yet recognize, or talk to them through code paths our scanner can't reach. A complete dependency list (every package, library, and binary, with integrity hashes) is on the roadmap; today we only show recognized hosts.
No one has audited this skill yet. That is different from “audited and clean” — it just means no professional reviewer (a security firm, the CryptoSkill team, or a verified independent researcher) has signed off on it. There are no audit reports to read. How reviewer levels work →
SKILL.md → SOURCE.md → TRUST.auto.yaml → Browse directory →
Auto-generated by cryptoskill/extract-capabilities/0.3.1 · hosted-service list version 2026-09-06 · how this is computed